Claim: "Girls are better at math than boys."
Evidence Provided: A study of one class found that the girls' mean test score was 87\(\pourcent\), while the boys' mean was 75\(\pourcent\).
Critical Evaluation: The general claim is not justified by the evidence provided.
- Limitation of the Sample (Generalizability): The sample consists of only one class. It is not random and is too small to be considered representative of the entire population of "all girls" and "all boys." The conclusion cannot be generalized beyond this specific group.
- Misinterpretation of Averages: The mean describes the central tendency of a group, not the performance of individuals. Even with a higher mean, it is highly probable that some boys in the class scored higher than some girls. The claim "Girls are better" is an overgeneralization that incorrectly implies this is true for every individual.
A more accurate and statistically valid conclusion is: "In the class that was studied, the mean score for girls was higher than the mean score for boys."